Yet another bug in 1.7.0_21

Discussion in 'Java' started by Roedy Green, Apr 17, 2013.

  1. Roedy Green

    Roedy Green Guest

    I got EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at
    pc=0x000000006c883b08, pid=2360, tid=3932


    in a large program I have been running for years without incident.

    This the worst release I have ever seen. I started with Java =1,0
    --
    Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
    Computer programming is the best remedy for pain (physical or emotional)
    I have encountered. It requires so much concentration there is nothing left
    over to pay attention to the pain. They should teach this in AA.
    Roedy Green, Apr 17, 2013
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Roedy Green

    Roedy Green Guest

    On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:02:57 -0700, Roedy Green
    <> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
    someone who said :

    >I got EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at
    >pc=0x000000006c883b08, pid=2360, tid=3932


    When run the same jar using jet runtime, it works fine.
    --
    Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
    Computer programming is the best remedy for pain (physical or emotional)
    I have encountered. It requires so much concentration there is nothing left
    over to pay attention to the pain. They should teach this in AA.
    Roedy Green, Apr 17, 2013
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Roedy Green

    Lew Guest

    Roedy Green wrote:
    > Roedy Green wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
    >> I got EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at
    >> pc=0x000000006c883b08, pid=2360, tid=3932

    >
    > When run the same jar [sic] using jet [sic] runtime, it works fine.


    Long on the complaint, short on the details.

    http://sscce.org/

    --
    Lew
    Lew, Apr 17, 2013
    #3
  4. Roedy Green

    Arne Vajhøj Guest

    On 4/16/2013 8:02 PM, Roedy Green wrote:
    > I got EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at
    > pc=0x000000006c883b08, pid=2360, tid=3932
    >
    > in a large program I have been running for years without incident.


    In my experience then that type of error typical comes from
    AWT not liking the graphics card.

    Arne
    Arne Vajhøj, Apr 17, 2013
    #4
  5. Roedy Green

    Roedy Green Guest

    On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:26:57 -0700 (PDT), Lew <>
    wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

    >Long on the complaint, short on the details.


    It had to happen in a huge program (this zip is 18 MB excluding of
    sample data files) and refused to give any details about where in my
    code the trouble was. At that point I just said, "This is a such a
    mess. Others will be having trouble too. I have to back off to the
    previous version".

    I will wait until 1.7.0_23 is released and give it another try.

    I really should do an SSCCE on the exec bug though. The string came
    from a parser, not direct as I showed. It could be the parser doing
    something strange under 1.7.0_21. I have some reason to think that is
    not so, but should eliminate the possibility completely.
    --
    Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
    Computer programming is the best remedy for pain (physical or emotional)
    I have encountered. It requires so much concentration there is nothing left
    over to pay attention to the pain. They should teach this in AA.
    Roedy Green, Apr 18, 2013
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Berehem
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    541
    Lawrence Kirby
    Apr 28, 2005
  2. Roedy Green

    JDK 1.5.0_21 released

    Roedy Green, Sep 8, 2009, in forum: Java
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    1,545
    Mike Amling
    Sep 14, 2009
  3. Roedy Green

    JDK 1.6.0_21 released

    Roedy Green, Jul 8, 2010, in forum: Java
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    7,357
    Roedy Green
    Jul 8, 2010
  4. Roedy Green

    JDK 1.7.0_21 and JDK 1.6.0_45

    Roedy Green, Apr 16, 2013, in forum: Java
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    412
    Arne Vajhøj
    Apr 17, 2013
  5. Roedy Green

    exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21

    Roedy Green, Apr 16, 2013, in forum: Java
    Replies:
    66
    Views:
    1,867
    Arne Vajhøj
    Apr 28, 2013
Loading...

Share This Page