Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Archive
Archive
Java
Class.forName().newInstance() vs new
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Michael Wojcik, post: 4222523"] Yes. A number of authors and poets at the time - coming out of the Modernist avant-garde period, High Literary Modernism, and the world wars - were both very interested in language and very concerned with its political ramifications. Besides Orwell you have for example Anthony Burgess and Aldous Huxley. The idea that language had political effectivity was rather in the air at the time, fed by psychoanalysis; structural linguistics anthropological theories like the (somewhat misnamed) "Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis"; discussions about art, propaganda, and culture among international Marxists; the work of philosophers such as Heidegger; and so on. But Orwell's is a particularly good example in this area. It's certainly a lot more readable than many of the contemporary philosophical treatments. (I like Derrida just fine, but few people would call _Spectres of Marx_, say, a light read.) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Archive
Archive
Java
Class.forName().newInstance() vs new
Top