Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Nick Coghlan, post: 1807197"] Huh - I thought I put something in the original post saying "without resorting to bytecode hacks", but I must have deleted it before sending the message. Anyway, that thread is what the comment about bytecode hacks would have been referring to :) Although, once the AST compiler goes in, if the AST for a function is attached via a special attribute like __ast__, then perhaps such manipulations could be rewritten to work on the AST instead of the bytecode. If that happens, they might become less hackish. So I guess I should wait and see what the next few months holds in terms of AST-hacks :) Cheers, Nick. [/QUOTE]