Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Craig Scott, post: 2918831"] I understand that if I define a constructor, then the compiler won't It's a bit more complicated than that. If you write any of your own constructors, the compiler will not generate a default constructor for you (see 12.1/5). Also, if you have a template constructor taking a single parameter, I believe that the compiler will still generate an implicit copy constructor even if the template version would otherwise be able to take the same parameter as the copy constructor. Anyone able to provide evidence for or against this in the standard? The closest I can find is 14.5.2/2, but that is talking about which one is called when a template and non-template member function are both present with the same name, not constructors specifically. [/QUOTE]