Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Andrey Tarasevich, post: 3524618"] Sorry, but what you said doesn't seem to make much sense. Firstly, there's no const type in this example. Secondly, when user does actually use an initializer of const type, the constructor that takes a non-const reference will not even qualify as a viable function. So no, it will not supersede anything. The behavior will be exactly opposite of what you said. How did you manage to derive these strange conclusions from the previous post from James is a mystery to me. [/QUOTE]