Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="David Masover, post: 4653276"] Done: [URL]http://github.com/masover/math[/URL] Unfortunately, github stopped doing gems, and I'm not up on this gemcutter stuff. (Get off my lawn!) I'm also not nearly confident enough in my choice of a name to publish anything. It's probably most useful if you look at HEAD^, where I had everything set up with relative requires, instead of a gem. Most of them at least have a legitimate reason for being -- something they claim to do better than the existing frameworks. I simply have no clue about any existing Ruby implementations of this. I'm also somewhat ashamed at the quality of this code. Not a test to be found! How can I call myself a Rubyist? My only excuse for this is that I've been using it so much interactively that it's all probably pretty well tested. But since I have no tests/specs and no documentation, good luck... [/QUOTE]