Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Paul Brannan, post: 4438070"] From what I understand, the purpose of that requirement isn't there so that you can relink modified versions of the library, but rather so that you can relink with a new version of the library when it is released. I think this is perfectly reasonable; if a commercial application is statically linked with an LGPL library that is found to have a serious security hole, it is a good thing that I can download the new version of the library from the author and relink. (not that I've ever done this, but it's nice to know that I can). Paul [/QUOTE]