Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="lovecreatesbeauty, post: 1542386"] The following shortened table comes from a big company's C++ technical document accompanied with its C++ compiler. This company's C++ compiler was/is very popular in Windows platform programming. But I'm not sure whether this table is accurate. The language standard says "Operator functions are inherited", I guess that it means all operator functions are inherited. But that table says operator = is not. Is operator = an exception? Could you please give me a another correct list to explain: 1. which member functions can be declared and/or defined implicitly? 2. which member functions can't be inherited in derived class? Thank you. -- Quotation 1 --------------------------------------- --------------- inheritable ? -- provided implicitly ? ------------------------------------------------------ constructor -------- no ---------------- yes --------- copy constructor --- no ---------------- yes --------- destructor --------- no ---------------- yes --------- operator = --------- no ---------------- yes --------- -- Quotation 1 ends ---------------------------------- -- Quotation 2: ISO/IEC 14882 --------------- 13.5 Overloaded operators 6 ...The meaning of the operator = , (unary) &, and , (comma), predefined for each type, can be changed for specific class and enumeration types by defining operator functions that implement these operators. Operator functions are inherited in the same manner as other base class functions. .... -- Quotation 2 ends ------------------------- [/QUOTE]

Verification