Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="JSH, post: 3619332"] I make LOTS of mistakes. P(x) = 175x^2 - 15x + 2 I already posted a correction. Hmmm...you have something wrong, maybe your CAS is broken? Did I? If I did I was wrong. There is no other case in all of mathematical history. Oh, you said "scientific" so yet another situation where you slightly switch the game. Science is another ball-game to mathematics. Mathematicians in contrast to scientists who hypothesize and experiment, claim to use proof exclusively and mathematical proof is perfect. Absolute. LOL. Many things over the years which is the point. I have years of experience here. Nothing that is being said here matters in the big picture, which is my point. I'm just goofing off. Bruce Eckel, the java book guy, that's who. I think I kind of freaked him out. Regardless he thought my prime counting function was kind of neat and offered that he might put it in his next edition. After emailing him I actually contacted...China. Turns out that Western mathematicians have ripped on the Chinese for years telling them their mathematical research is inferior. I thought maybe they might help me, but never got a reply out of that country. That was years ago. Nope. You guessed wrong. You did not give a counter-example to the actual algorithm. You DID give a counter-example to an algorithm I recently presented which I noted myself was incorrect. Instead you have SAID you gave a counter-example as if you had done so to the actual solution, which to me is a bit of dishonesty which is telling. Google results can vary by region. What country are you in? Your claims of counter-example to the optimal path engine are bogus as I never saw any presented by you. You DID present a counter-example to an algorithm that I presented in posts on the newsgroup, kind of on the fly, which was not the correct one, which I acknowledged. Your lying about the details is more telling than anything else and your repetitive replies indicate attention seeking behavior. I will play that out as long as you wish but nothing will change. At the end of it, eventually, you will stop as have so many others before you. But your newsgroup will know maybe a little more about you, if they didn't already. Your wishes do not make reality. Present a counter-example to the correct algorithm, if you can. Or quit lying. James Harris [/QUOTE]

Verification