Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Patricia Shanahan, post: 605219"] [email]iamfractal@hotmail.com[/email] wrote: .... .... Difficulty finding even one good name for a method may indicate a deeper problem that does need to be addressed. Ideally, a method has a single cohesive purpose, and the name reflects that. A method that does this or that, without an obvious purpose that covers both, may not be that cohesive. This is different from having several good names for a method. In that case, I agree with "choose a name, and move on". Unless it is going to be a widely distributed library method, you can always refactor later for consistency. Patricia [/QUOTE]