Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Kevin Goodsell, post: 1457690"]
There are a lot of possible contributors to the performance decrease. I
don't know how you are measuring the time, but note that you are
constructing 30000000 class instances, which is obviously going to take
some time. Did you include that in your timing?

Another likely issue is that you've reduced the compiler's ability to
optimize.

You can create pretty significant optimizations by using classes well,
but if you use them poorly all you do is complicate the compiler's job,
likely making the code less efficient.

You don't need to say 'inline' here. Functions defined within the class
definition are always inlined.

If that was supposed to be a conversion to int you got it wrong.

operator int() { return i; }

Why macros? Macros are bad. Use typedef and const instead.

I don't think this is a legal signature for main. According to the
standard, the second argument must be 'char *argv[]' or something
equivalent. I don't think adding 'const' is allowed.

What's with the extra redundant blocks?
[i][i][i][i]

-Kevin[/i][/i][/i][/i]
[/QUOTE]

Verification