Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hampton, post: 4495128"] Ryan- It was supposed to be a funny statement. I even used a ;) And of course calling my "exhaustive" (hint in the name) a *tad* slower is absolutely, 100% absurdist. I used the wrong AO list as mentioned in my other response. I apologize to all those who my not paying attention to "primitive weird numbers" and "weird numbers" hurt in the process. This quiz is for *fun* not competition. -hampton. PS: For further clarification, about 50% of this message is also supposed to be somewhat amusing. [/QUOTE]