Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SAM, post: 4981758"] Le 12/12/08 7:05 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn a Ã©crit : No, on Mac it is Geneva or Lucida Grande. Anyway ... what importance ? If all the text is in a certain font, all is OK. From the point where any of those proposed has her shape close of her neighbor I think there is no big problem. Perhaps it isn't a very good idea to give veradana in first. But it isn't inconceivable. And then ? I really do not understand where is the problem. If somebody wants to show his text in Verdana, it is his choice. You can judge it is not appropriate to your taste but not more. Telling that fonts of substitution are smaller is not really important from the moment they are graphically enough close. No ? And CSS1 isn't an argument. Small fonts not more. I think. Personally, and even if everybody doesn't care, I do : font-family: geneva, helevetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif. Because ... - I like these fonts in this order (prefering geneva) - I try to declare fonts whom some are possibly installed at everybody - geneva and helvetica on any Mac and I don't give Lucida as I don't know how it is out of Mac - arial and probably verdana on any system runing a M$ product Yes ... arial smaller and verdana bigger than geneva (we try to do the less worst with what we have ... or expect to) - generic for the rest [/QUOTE]