Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Eric Sosman, post: 4214969"] Unspecified, yes. Simultaneously, no. Even if a particular implementation finds it can run each `x != 0' (or each `x' and each `0', for that matter) in parallel, I repeat: C has no way to express a requirement for parallelism. If you think C has such expressive power, pray exhibit some fragment of C that *requires* parallel execution (other than hand- waving about `volatile' variables and asynchronous signals, already mentioned up-thread and dismissed as not germane to the O.P.'s wish). [/QUOTE]