Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="David Wahler, post: 1849259"] Well, in your example the '>' operator already returns a boolean value so you can just use it directly. Hoewver, I agree that there are situations in which a ternary operator would be nice. Unfortunately, Python doesn't support this directly; the closest approximation I've found is: This exploits the fact that False and True are converted to integers as zero and one, respectively. The downside is that it's really ugly. Also, it doesn't use minimal evaluation; in other words, if you try an expression like: You might think this would return the value of func() if it's callable, and None otherwise. Unfortunately, func() is evaluated no matter what, even if the condition is false. Of course, you can always get around this by doing really cryptic stuff with lambdas: .... but by that point, you're better off just using an if/then/else. -- David [/QUOTE]