Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Archive
Archive
C++
Typecasting operator on simple types vs. classes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Nikolai Borissov, post: 1462492"] That's right, because t1 and t2 are objects of different type. It's already not a technical matter, rather a design one. OP is supposed to know the purpose of his design. Maybe t1[] being of type int and t2[] of type double is exactly what he wants. And I'm thinking about Occum's Razor: "Entities must not be multiplied beyond what is necessary" Here's an original Latin version: "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate" Nikolai Borissov [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Archive
Archive
C++
Typecasting operator on simple types vs. classes
Top
