Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Archive
Archive
Ruby
Why is there no Smalltalk-like IDE for Ruby?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="zimbatm, post: 4514572"] I think that the main difference is that Ruby is not capable of restoring the parsed source code. When you call ruby on a script it will be transformed in an AST tree. All the source code comments will be lost. Reference to the source code is stored but if you have a Squeak like VM, everything is an eval'ed code. I've played a little bit with Squeak and it looks like every bit of information you write is retained. There is also a lot of work involved in the bytecode on disk storage and restoring which wasn't even approached in the ruby community. Maybe introdocing a bytecode VM like YARV will change that status ? Cheers, zimbatm [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Archive
Archive
Ruby
Why is there no Smalltalk-like IDE for Ruby?
Top