F
Friedrich Dominicus
Dear ruby lovers, we (the Q Software Solutions GmbH) have worked on a
Ruby IDE for Windows OSes for some time now. It will be a reasonable
priced IDE with a
working Resource Editor. We'll publish it in different steps.
- first it will be a base IDE whitout the Resource Editor (Editor,
Debugger-Frontend, Ruby interaction facilities
- browser (Modules, Classes, Functions etc.
- with the resource editor it will be possible to "lay-out" GUI
graphically; the framework of the applications and the callback code
will be generated and you will be able to jumb from the graphical view
ot the edit view and back.
Now we are a bit unsure about the browser facilities. We checked out
diverse Smalltalk implementations and other browsers. We wonder if you
would find it useful to have a "file-view". E.g if you have this
class Foo
include "whatever"
it might look like
- Foo
-- depends on "whatever"
Another question is would you prefer a Tree-view layout or a more
"traditional" Smalltalk layout?
Regards
Friedrich
Ruby IDE for Windows OSes for some time now. It will be a reasonable
priced IDE with a
working Resource Editor. We'll publish it in different steps.
- first it will be a base IDE whitout the Resource Editor (Editor,
Debugger-Frontend, Ruby interaction facilities
- browser (Modules, Classes, Functions etc.
- with the resource editor it will be possible to "lay-out" GUI
graphically; the framework of the applications and the callback code
will be generated and you will be able to jumb from the graphical view
ot the edit view and back.
Now we are a bit unsure about the browser facilities. We checked out
diverse Smalltalk implementations and other browsers. We wonder if you
would find it useful to have a "file-view". E.g if you have this
class Foo
include "whatever"
it might look like
- Foo
-- depends on "whatever"
Another question is would you prefer a Tree-view layout or a more
"traditional" Smalltalk layout?
Regards
Friedrich