Brent's variation of a factorization algorithm

N

n00m

Maybe someone'll make use of it:


def gcd(x, y):
if y == 0:
return x
return gcd(y, x % y)

def brent(n):
c = 11
y, r, q, m = 1, 1, 1, 137
while 1:
x = y
for i in range(1, r + 1):
y = (y * y + c) % n
k = 0
while 1:
ys = y
for i in range(1, min(m, r - k) + 1):
y = (y * y + c) % n
q = (q * abs(x - y)) % n
g = gcd(q, n)
k += m
if k >=r or g > 1:
break
r *= 2
if g > 1:
break
if g == n:
while 1:
ys = (ys * ys + c) % n
g = gcd(abs(x - ys), n)
if g > 1:
break
return g


while 1:
n = eval(raw_input())
g = brent(n)
print '==', g, '*', n / g



IDLE 1.2 ==== No Subprocess ====

1170999422783 * 10001
== 73 * 160426920921271
1170999422783 * 254885996264477
== 1170999422783 * 254885996264477
1170999422783 * 415841978209842084233328691123
== 1170999422783 * 415841978209842084233328691123
51539607551 * 80630964769
== 51539607551 * 80630964769
304250263527209 * 792606555396977
== 304250263527209 * 792606555396977
 
N

n00m

Being an absolute dummy in Theory of Number
for me ***c'est fantastique*** that brent() works =)

PS
1.
Values of magic parameters c = 11 and m = 137
almost don't matter. Usually they choose c = 2
(what about to run brent() in parallel with different
values of "c" waiting for "n" is cracked?)

2.
Before calling brent() "n" should be tested for its
primality. If it is a prime brent(n) may freeze for good.

3.
A better place to publish this code would be the Python Cookbook:

It requires a tedious registration etc.
Gabriel, don't you mind to publish the code there by yourself?
In the long run, it is an invention by Richard Brent (b.1946) =)
I just rewrote it to Python from a pseudo-code once available in
Wiki but which for some vague reason was later on removed from there.
 
I

Irmen de Jong

Maybe someone'll make use of it:


def gcd(x, y):
if y == 0:
return x
return gcd(y, x % y)

def brent(n):
[...]

[D:\Projects]python brentfactor.py
999999999
== 27 * 37037037

What gives? Isn't this thing supposed to factor numbers into the product
of two primes?

-irmen
 
N

n00m

999999999
== 27 * 37037037

What gives? Isn't this thing supposed to factor numbers into the product
of two primes?

-irmen

Only if you yield to it a SEMIprime =)
27 * 37037037
Now you can apply brent() to these numbers, and so on
 
I

Irmen de Jong

Only if you yield to it a SEMIprime =)

A 'semiprime' being a product of 2 prime numbers, I suppose.
Now you can apply brent() to these numbers, and so on

Right :) I more or less expected it to do that by itself (didn't look
at the algorithm)

But you wrote that it might run indefinately if you feed it a prime
number. There's no safeguard then against getting into an endless loop
if you keep applying brent() to the factors it produces? Because in the
end one or both factors will be prime...

-irmen
 
N

n00m

A 'semiprime' being a product of 2 prime numbers, I suppose.


Right :)   I more or less expected it to do that by itself (didn't look
at the algorithm)

But you wrote that it might run indefinately if you feed it a prime
number. There's no safeguard then against getting into an endless loop
if you keep applying brent() to the factors it produces? Because in the
end one or both factors will be prime...

-irmen


Just to use e.g. Rabin-Miller's before supplying a number to brent()
A 'semiprime' being a product of 2 prime numbers, I suppose.

Aha, exactly.
==============================
Also it's worthy to test a num is it a perfect square?
But all this is obvious trifles...
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,580
Members
45,053
Latest member
BrodieSola

Latest Threads

Top