Deadlockproblem

  • Thread starter Asterix Gallier
  • Start date
A

Asterix Gallier

Hello,

i'm trying to realize asynchronous communication, but the sender have to
wait until the answer is recieved.
Although it is only one kind of message allowed at each time. Here is my
code and the output.

using ruby-1.8.5 on winxp

-----
require 'thread'

$msgQueueGlobal = Queue.new
$recieverList = Array.new


# ################################
# simulating the communication hardware
def sendMsgGlobal(msg)
$msgQueueGlobal.push(msg)
end

def recvMsgGlobal
$msgQueueGlobal.pop
end

recvThread = Thread.new {
puts "start recvThread ..."
loop do
msg = recvMsgGlobal()
$recieverList[msg[0]].handleRecv(msg)
end
}
puts "recvThread started"


# ################################
# Object holding sendMessagefunction wich have to be executed only once
a
# time
class Card
def initialize(number)
@nr = number
$recieverList[@nr] = self

@waitLock = false
@waitMutex = Mutex.new
@waitConditional = ConditionVariable.new

@syncMutex = Mutex.new
@syncConditional = ConditionVariable.new
end

def sendMsg
@syncMutex.synchronize {
msg = [@nr, " Message: #{Thread.current[:name]}"]
puts "#{Thread.current[:name]}) sending message ... <#{msg}>"


@waitMutex.synchronize {
@waitConditional.wait(@waitMutex) if @waitQueue
@waitLock = true
}

sendMsgGlobal(msg)

puts "#{Thread.current[:name]}) message send and waiting for
answer ..."
@syncConditional.wait(@syncMutex)
puts "#{Thread.current[:name]}) answer recieved <#{msg}>"
}
end

def handleRecv(msg)
@syncMutex.synchronize {
@syncConditional.signal
}
@waitMutex.synchronize {
@waitLock = false
@waitConditional.signal
}
end
end

Thread.current[:name] = "Main"
a = Card.new(0)

t1 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t1"; a.sendMsg }
t2 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t2"; a.sendMsg }
t3 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t3"; a.sendMsg }
t4 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t4"; a.sendMsg }
t5 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t5"; a.sendMsg }
t6 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t6"; a.sendMsg }
t7 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t7"; a.sendMsg }
t8 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t8"; a.sendMsg }
t9 = Thread.new { Thread.current[:name] = "t9"; a.sendMsg }

Thread.list.each{ |t| t.join if t }

-------
output:
start recvThread ...
recvThread started
t1) sending message ... <0 Message: t1>
t1) message send and waiting for answer ...
t4) sending message ... <0 Message: t4>
t4) message send and waiting for answer ...
t3) sending message ... <0 Message: t3>
t3) message send and waiting for answer ...
t2) sending message ... <0 Message: t2>
t2) message send and waiting for answer ...
t1) answer recieved <0 Message: t1>
t5) sending message ... <0 Message: t5>
t5) message send and waiting for answer ...
t8) sending message ... <0 Message: t8>
t8) message send and waiting for answer ...
t7) sending message ... <0 Message: t7>
t7) message send and waiting for answer ...
t6) sending message ... <0 Message: t6>
t6) message send and waiting for answer ...
t4) answer recieved <0 Message: t4>
t9) sending message ... <0 Message: t9>
t9) message send and waiting for answer ...
t3) answer recieved <0 Message: t3>
t2) answer recieved <0 Message: t2>
t5) answer recieved <0 Message: t5>
t8) answer recieved <0
deadlock 0x277c804: sleep:J(0x2817bd8) (main) -
D:/_studium/diplom/adios/AdiosTester.rb:79
deadlock 0x2817bd8: sleep:- - C:/ruby_1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/thread.rb:318
C:/ruby_1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/thread.rb:318: Thread(0x2817bd8): deadlock
(fatal)
from D:/_studium/diplom/adios/AdiosTester.rb:79
Message: t8>
t7) answer recieved <0 Message: t7>
t6) answer recieved <0 Message: t6>
t9) answer recieved <0 Message: t9>

------------------------

My questions:
- why did this deadlock occur, and how can it be fixed
- is there another/better way for reaching this goal

with regards
Asterix
 
A

ara.t.howard

Hello,

i'm trying to realize asynchronous communication, but the sender have to
wait until the answer is recieved.

but that's synchronous! ;-)

seriously, if the send always waits for the answer what good does it do thread
your program?
My questions:
- why did this deadlock occur, and how can it be fixed

among other things, you never do anything with @waitQueue - you simply always
set @waitLock to true.
- is there another/better way for reaching this goal

harp:~ > cat a.rb
require 'thread'
class Oracle
def initialize
@questions = Queue.new
@thread = Thread.new(@questions){|q|
loop{
question, answer_with = q.pop
answer_with[question.to_s + ' 42']
}
}
end
def ask question, &answer_with
if answer_with
@questions.push [question, answer_with]
else
q = Queue.new
ask(question){|answer| q.push answer}
Thread.new{ q.pop }
end
end
def self.instance(*a, &b) @instance ||= new(*a, &b) end
def self.ask(*a, &b) instance.ask *a, &b end
end

#
# you can block up front
#
n = -1
p Oracle.ask("something #{ n += 1 }:").value

#
# or ask and reap later
#
threads = []
7.times{ threads << Oracle.ask("something #{ n += 1 }:") }
threads.map{|t| p t.value}


harp:~ > ruby a.rb
"something 0: 42"
"something 1: 42"
"something 2: 42"
"something 3: 42"
"something 4: 42"
"something 5: 42"
"something 6: 42"
"something 7: 42"


regards.

-a
 
A

Asterix Gallier

Thank you very much for your answer, i will try to solve my problem
based on the code you gave me.

Cheers
Asterixh
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,774
Messages
2,569,596
Members
45,143
Latest member
DewittMill
Top