I
Ivan Shmakov
I'm curious, what's the current preferred naming scheme for Perl
bindings to C libraries? Given such modules as GD or
Image::Magick, I'd assume that the bindings for Libfoobar are
ought to live in a module named Libfoobar.
Somehow, however, I'd find it tempting to use a longer, yet more
descriptive, Foo::Bar::Libfoobar; especially if there's a
related Foo::Bar module already on CPAN, and that Foo::Bar would
be the "proper" name for Libfoobar, should it be (re)implemented
as a native Perl library.
Perhaps there's anything else to consider?
TIA.
bindings to C libraries? Given such modules as GD or
Image::Magick, I'd assume that the bindings for Libfoobar are
ought to live in a module named Libfoobar.
Somehow, however, I'd find it tempting to use a longer, yet more
descriptive, Foo::Bar::Libfoobar; especially if there's a
related Foo::Bar module already on CPAN, and that Foo::Bar would
be the "proper" name for Libfoobar, should it be (re)implemented
as a native Perl library.
Perhaps there's anything else to consider?
TIA.