Forcing local scoping

[Joe Seigh]

Is there any way of forcing local scoping that's a little cleaner
than using an anonymous inner class? I need to be able to enforce
some before entering block and after entering block actions.
Anonymous inner classes seem a little kludgy.

 

[Tom Hawtin]

Is there any way of forcing local scoping that's a little cleaner
than using an anonymous inner class? I need to be able to enforce
some before entering block and after entering block actions.
Anonymous inner classes seem a little kludgy.

I don't think they are a kludge (well other than the implementation into
the class file format). It's just the syntax is highly verbose for a
simple ExecuteAround.

You could generate a proxy for appropriately annotated methods, but that
would be even more of a kludge.

Tom Hawtin

 

[Joe Seigh]

I don't think they are a kludge (well other than the implementation into
the class file format). It's just the syntax is highly verbose for a
simple ExecuteAround.

You could generate a proxy for appropriately annotated methods, but that
would be even more of a kludge.

Plus it's not really a block but a method call so you lose local variable
scoping. Ah well, I'll probably just go with requiring the user to use
enter and exit block actions in a try/finally block. Thanks anyway.