help

[Hatter]

default access in class,
I declare a class like:
class ClassA
{
int getValue()
{
return 0;
}
}

then what is the type of method:getValue?
public?protected?or private?

I use ClassA.class.GetMethods() to get the method list of class ClassA,
but getValue was not in the list.
Can anyone tell me why??

 

[trippy]

Hatter took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh
Wow"...

default access in class,
I declare a class like:
class ClassA
{
int getValue()
{
return 0;
}
}

then what is the type of method:getValue?
int

public?protected?or private?

I believe the modifier would be public.

I use ClassA.class.GetMethods() to get the method list of class ClassA,
but getValue was not in the list.
Can anyone tell me why??

Try ClassA.getMethods()

--
trippy
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

NP: "The American Way" -- Sacred Reich

"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,
but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife,
and a smile."

-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"

 

[Knute Johnson]

I believe the modifier would be public.

It is not public but is accessible in the package in which it is declared.

 

[trippy]

It is not public but is accessible in the package in which it is declared.

Right.

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/names.doc.html#
104285

Thanks.

--
trippy
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

NP: "The American Way" -- Sacred Reich

"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,
but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife,
and a smile."

-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"

 

[Hatter]

I got it, thanks.

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/names.doc.html#
104285

Thanks.

--
trippy
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

NP: "The American Way" -- Sacred Reich

"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,
but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife,
and a smile."

-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"

 

[Andrew Thompson]

trippy wrote:
....

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/names.doc.html#
104285

To protect long URL's from line-wrap,
enclose them in '<', '>'. E.G.
<http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/names.doc.html#104285>

Andrew T.

 

[Chris Uppal]

It is not public but is accessible in the package in which it is declared.

Just to add: The default visibility level is often called either "default
access" or "package private".

-- chris

 

[Knute Johnson]

trippy wrote:
...

To protect long URL's from line-wrap,
enclose them in '<', '>'. E.G.
<http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/names.doc.html#104285>

Andrew T.

That's a neat trick that I didn't know!

 

[Andrew Thompson]

....
That's a neat trick that I didn't know!

Yeah, that one is handy to know.

Unfortunately not even *that* will fix the BA URL
anchors that are used in the JavaDocs.

E.G.
<http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/swing/JLabel.html#JLabel(java.lang.String,
int)>
...or..
<http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/swing/JLabel.html#JLabel(java.lang.String, int)>

I tried to put a bug report/RFE in with Sun to have
the standard doclet changed, but never heard anything
after the original auto-generated email.. :-(

Andrew T.

 

[Knute Johnson]

Just to add: The default visibility level is often called either "default
access" or "package private".

-- chris

I tried to be careful not to use words that were not in the JLS and
probably should have just quoted it.

From the JLS, third edition:

"If a top level class or interface type is not declared public, then it
may be accessed only from within the package in which it is declared."

 

[Daniel Pitts]

default access in class,
I declare a class like:
class ClassA
{
int getValue()
{
return 0;
}
}

then what is the type of method:getValue?
public?protected?or private?

I use ClassA.class.GetMethods() to get the method list of class ClassA,
but getValue was not in the list.
Can anyone tell me why??

Specifically, ClassA.class.getDeclaredMethods() should return the
method, because it returns all methods declared by that class, public
or otherwise,

 

[trippy]

That's a neat trick that I didn't know!

Me either. Thanks Andrew.

--
trippy
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

NP: "The American Way" -- Sacred Reich

"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,
but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife,
and a smile."

-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"

 

[John W. Kennedy]

Me either. Thanks Andrew.

It is can be better to use
<URL:http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/names.doc.html#104285>,
which was once part of the official URL standard. It was deleted from
the standard for lack of use, but is still supported in some software.

 

[Andrew Thompson]

John W. Kennedy wrote:
....

It is can be better to use
<URL:http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/names.doc.html#104285>,
which was once part of the official URL standard. ..

Aaah yes, I knew there was a still better form of
URL representation, but had forgotten what it was,
so decided it better not to comment.

...It was deleted from
the standard for lack of use, but is still supported in some software.

I am not sure if this has been asked/answered before,
but do you know of any software that would recognise
the full form, but *not* the more abbreviated form I first
listed?
(The short form is an entire 4 *chars.* shorter, after all!)

Oh, and as a side comment. If *you* have control over the URL,
a 'short, stable URL' lacking in characters such as '-', '_', '.', ' ',
'CAPITALS' or other extraneous/confusing characters, is way
better than any scheme to try and protect them from wrap,
after the effect..

A 'good' URL - beats any/all efforts to fix a 'bad' one.

Andrew T.

 

[Daniel Pitts]

John W. Kennedy wrote:
...

Aaah yes, I knew there was a still better form of
URL representation, but had forgotten what it was,
so decided it better not to comment.


I am not sure if this has been asked/answered before,
but do you know of any software that would recognise
the full form, but *not* the more abbreviated form I first
listed?
(The short form is an entire 4 *chars.* shorter, after all!)

Oh, and as a side comment. If *you* have control over the URL,
a 'short, stable URL' lacking in characters such as '-', '_', '.', ' ',
'CAPITALS' or other extraneous/confusing characters, is way
better than any scheme to try and protect them from wrap,
after the effect..

A 'good' URL - beats any/all efforts to fix a 'bad' one.

Andrew T.

URLs that bother me:
If it ends with an extension that specifies the generating technology,
not the response type:
* http://someplace.com/showForm.jsp -- should probably be
showForm.html
* http://someplace.com/index.php -- injection attack anyone?
* whatever.asp, whatever.cgi, etc... -- you get the point

If it can become invalid for stupid reasons.
* http://www.mycompany.com/hr/John_Smith/benefits.html -- Well, John
Smith just quit, everyone has to update their bookmarks.

If it doesn't describe the resource.
* http://tinyurl.com/garbage -- don't get me started on tinyurl

If it contains the words geocities, myspace, anglefire, etc...
* Do you REALLY need an example

 

[John W. Kennedy]

I am not sure if this has been asked/answered before,
but do you know of any software that would recognise
the full form, but *not* the more abbreviated form I first
listed?
(The short form is an entire 4 *chars.* shorter, after all!)

I've been using <URL:.> for too long to remember, now, but at one point
I know I needed it. I've been using Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox for a very
long time, so it would be somewhere in that chain. But I don't know the
current state of affairs.