I think the main issue is not as much that such desire, goal
is no longer safely achievable in a reliable manner as that
such desire, goal is anti-accessibility to content and to
browser functionalities (e.g.: increasing font size, printing,
saving in a bookmark, etc.) and counter-usability. Trying to
remove scrollbars, statusbar, etc... just makes a window less
flexible, less usable, can only contribute to problems (increase
chances of creating problems) to problems on the user end.
I would not disagree that removing all window features will have exactly
those consequences. So there are two facts:-
The desired goal is a really bad idea and will predictably cause more
problems than it could ever be hoped to address.
-And:-
The desired goal cannot be achieved reliably so whatever the problem it
is intended to address this cannot be a solution.
Either, in isolation, would be grounds for abandoning the goal and
re-defining the problem into a form that has a solution. Put them
together and the current goal should not even seem worth considering.
There are many coding manners, practices, webdesign
implementations which can be achieved in a reliable manner
and which are definitively not recommendable.
Yes, there are certainly no shortage of bad ideas that can be
implemented reliably. But then there was a time when the control of
window features could be attempted with some reliability, and it was the
ill-considered use of that ability that resulted in it becoming
unreliable.
Richard, the OP multiposted that question in several newsgroups.
I hadn't noticed the question in other groups, just yesterdays here.
Which mostly received answers stressing the undesirability of the
action, which in part is what motivated me to stress the reliability
aspect of the proposed goal, for some variety. I am not surprised that,
if re-posted here upon receiving a disparaging response, the question
was multiposted elsewhere.
Richard.