W
Will Ware
I'm working on a piece of software that uses PyQt and PyOpenGL for
drawing acceleration. While profiling it to find opportunities to speed
things up, I got this from the profiler:
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
12108/12084 55.390 0.005 55.390 0.005 :0(getattr)
2934 0.430 0.000 1.240 0.000
files_mmp.py:344(_read_atom)
1 0.310 0.310 59.240 59.240 :0(exec_loop)
2934 0.210 0.000 0.310 0.000
chem.py:1774(best_atomtype_for_numbonds)
8737 0.150 0.000 0.190 0.000 :0(map)
2944 0.150 0.000 0.450 0.000 chem.py:288(__init__)
....more.....
I assume ":0(getattr)" means a getattr function in either PyQt or
PyOpenGL. I grepped the sources of both looking for getattr, and it
doesn't appear in PyQt but appears frequently in PyOpenGL. Does anybody
know if I am correct in my conclusion that most of the program's time
is being spent in some getattr function in PyOpenGL?
Thanks
Will Ware
drawing acceleration. While profiling it to find opportunities to speed
things up, I got this from the profiler:
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
12108/12084 55.390 0.005 55.390 0.005 :0(getattr)
2934 0.430 0.000 1.240 0.000
files_mmp.py:344(_read_atom)
1 0.310 0.310 59.240 59.240 :0(exec_loop)
2934 0.210 0.000 0.310 0.000
chem.py:1774(best_atomtype_for_numbonds)
8737 0.150 0.000 0.190 0.000 :0(map)
2944 0.150 0.000 0.450 0.000 chem.py:288(__init__)
....more.....
I assume ":0(getattr)" means a getattr function in either PyQt or
PyOpenGL. I grepped the sources of both looking for getattr, and it
doesn't appear in PyQt but appears frequently in PyOpenGL. Does anybody
know if I am correct in my conclusion that most of the program's time
is being spent in some getattr function in PyOpenGL?
Thanks
Will Ware