java runtime problems

[Andrew Thompson]

Being a multi-poster is a fairly siple problem to
fix. Your other problems, incluung the over
inflated sense of self entitlement, are more
tricky.

I am seeking to develop
java apps on mepis linux (ver. 3.4-3). I have installed jdk 1.6.0 and
i am having runtime error problems.
..
package start;
..
Aesotericon@5[HelloWorldSwing]$ /home/Aesotericon/Documents/jdk1.6.0/
bin/java HelloWorldSwing
The fully qualified name of this class is 'start.HelloWorldSwing'.
Perhaps you might run it using
..java start.HellowWorldSwing
OTOH - I guess then you will be getting a 'wrong package'
or similar error.
As an initial test, I would recommend commenting out
or removing the package statement, then recompiling it
and trying again with.
..java HelloWorldSwing
Then you might (later) figure how to compile and run
packaged code.
..
As you all see, I have tried several methods of running the program,
but it will not work. I feel like a simpleton, but does anyone have
any suggestions? It seems that java is having a hard time finding
my .class file. I dunno...
For best help, it is advisable to use the more
common forms of expressions (no 'slang').
Note that *many* of the people who contribute
to these forums speak Engilsh as a Second
(3rd.. etc.) Language, and might not recognise
'dunno' as 'do not know'. Also, many of us who
*do* speak English as a native tongue, simply
don't like seeing such abbreviations.
That being said, I myself occasionally use slang
words, but usually only in replies to people whom
I am confident would understand what I mean.
(Oh, and the word 'I' should always be Upper Case
in English - *always*.)

....
please limit replies to those directly relating to the conversation at
hand...

Pleas get yourself a help-desk. These are
discussion forums.

got a *useful* reply to this question on another thread.

Sure you did. Six minutes later than my
reply on your first thread, that pointed
out the same thing.

(Title changed, and x-posted to c.l.j.p./h.
in effots to combine the multi-post, with
follow-ups to c.l.j.h. only)

Andrew T.

 

[nebulous99]

Being a multi-poster is a fairly siple problem to
fix.

Nor is it an obviously relevant one here.

[unprovoked insults aimed at the OP snipped]

[lots of quoted material snipped, most of which is totally bogus --
none of the other articles in this thread contain e.g. this:]

[snip rest]

Pleas get yourself a help-desk. These are
discussion forums.

The original post seemed perfectly polite and on-topic to me. It is
detailed; it even contains an SSCCE. Yet you respond not only
negatively, but in a manner that makes it seem you are actually
replying to something else entirely and your reply was posted to the
wrong thread.

Your response is frankly baffling, Andrew.

AFAICT, either you posted your response to thread A into thread B, or
at least you're referencing events in thread A in thread B instead of
confining your reply in thread B to subject matter raised in thread B.
Thread B in this case not having previously involved any grammar
quibbles, nor any of the other mostly non-Java-related things you rave
and ramble on about in your post.

Contrast your response with Gordon's, which follows quite logically
from the OP's post and which resulted in a polite thank-you from the
OP.