122> Newsgroups:
comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.text.tex
122> Are you claiming, then, that OS/2 is more obscure than QNX?
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Eater? The
sentence that you decided not to quote addresses your question.
122> In your wildest dreams, perhaps, tholenbot.
Who is "tholenbot", Eater? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.
123> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy
123> It's perfectly on topic there, jerkwad. We were dicsussing OS/2's
use of
123> the 80286's multitasking support features, which few other
operating
123> systems did at the time. If that isn't a useful bit of
information for
123> OS/2 advocates I don't know what is.
Then why don't you read some of the OS/2 newsgroups to find out
what sort of questions people ask that represent useful bits of
information, Eater?
124> Newsgroups:
comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.games.roguelike.development
124> It's perfectly on topic there. We were dicsussing OS/2's use of
the
124> 80286's multitasking support features, which few other operating
systems
124> did at the time. If that isn't a useful bit of information for OS/
2
124> advocates I don't know what is.
Then why don't you read some of the OS/2 newsgroups to find out
what sort of questions people ask that represent useful bits of
information, Eater?
124> By the first on-topic traffic they've had in ages?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
