Hi rjack,
How are you doing on this issue and does the information in my last reply
helps a littile? If there're anything else we can help, please feel free to
post here.
Thanks,
Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support
Get Secure!
www.microsoft.com/security
--------------------
| X-Tomcat-ID: 83793527
| References: <
[email protected]>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| From: (e-mail address removed) (Steven Cheng[MSFT])
| Organization: Microsoft
| Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:43:51 GMT
| Subject: RE: Language in Page directive in VS 2005
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| Lines: 101
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:128172
| NNTP-Posting-Host: tomcatimport2.phx.gbl 10.201.218.182
|
| Hi rjack,
|
| Welcome to ASPNET newsgroup.
| As for the programming Lanugage for ASP.NET 2.0 page,'s aspx file and
| codebehind file, here are some of my understanding:
|
| Yes, as you've found for the current asp.net 2.0 page model, we are
forced
| to use the same programming language for aspx page and codebehind class.
| This is because in asp.net 2.0, we 're using the partial class for
asp.net
| page. The .aspx file and codebehind File are of the same class, so that
| they're compiled into the same class at dynamic compilation. So the class
| declaration in codebehind file is
|
| public partial class mdpage : System.Web.UI.Page
|
|
| btw, in asp.net 1.x ,the code behind class and aspx page is compiled into
| different class, they're parent/child class relation (aspx generated
class
| derived from the codebehind class). that's why they can use different
| language to program while it is not allowed in the 2.0 model.
|
| In fact, the 2.0's partial class model has bring much more good features
| than the old one, for example, we don't need to explicitly declare member
| field for control instances in codebeind file....
|
| Here are the msdn reference which demonstrate the page compilation model
| change from beta1 to beta2:
|
| #Changes for Beta 2
|
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/beta2/beta2update.aspx
|
| You can also find some other article on asp.net 2.0 's beta feature
| change/postpone or beta2 to RTM changes.
|
| Hope helps. Thanks,
|
| Steven Cheng
| Microsoft Online Support
|
| Get Secure!
www.microsoft.com/security
| (This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
| rights.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| --------------------
| | From: (e-mail address removed)
| | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| | Subject: Language in Page directive in VS 2005
| | Date: 29 Sep 2005 13:07:26 -0700
| | Organization:
http://groups.google.com
| | Lines: 29
| | Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| | NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.81.183.207
| | Mime-Version: 1.0
| | Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
| | X-Trace: posting.google.com 1128024452 10674 127.0.0.1 (29 Sep 2005
| 20:07:32 GMT)
| | X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
| | NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:07:32 +0000 (UTC)
| | User-Agent: G2/0.2
| | X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
SV1;
| .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Alexa Toolbar; .NET CLR
| 2.0.50215),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
| | Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
| | Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=68.81.183.207;
| | posting-account=egBesgwAAADr2AGpmzETviTrt74lbz3H
| | Path:
|
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
|
ne.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f1
| 4g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
| | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
| microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:128088
| | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| |
| | I'm using VS 2005 Beta 2.
| |
| | In VS 2003, the Page directive in an aspx page has Language and
| | CodeBehind attributes. You can have the language be different than the
| | code behind file language. For instance, you can have
| |
| | Language="vb"
| | CodeBehind="classA.cs"
| |
| | In VS 2005, the CodeBehind attribute seems to have been replaced with
| | the CodeFile attribute, although this is not documented in the beta
| | documentation. Therefore, it becomes
| |
| | Language="vb"
| | CodeFile="classA.cs"
| |
| | This causes a compile error:
| |
| | "The language of the code file is inconsistent with the language of the
| | page."
| |
| | According to the documentation for both VS 2003 and VS 2005, the
| | Language directive is supposed to be the language embedded in the aspx
| | page. Therefore, I should be able to have a Language that is different
| | from the CodeFile page in VS 2005.
| |
| | Why do I get this error? Is there a way to have a language for the page
| | be different from the code file language?
| |
| |
|
|
