A
Aaron
Is there a way I can loop through everything that is in session?
R
Ray at
Dim ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur
For Each ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur In Session.Contents
Response.Write ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur & " = " &
Session(ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur) & "<br>"
Next
Ray at work
For Each ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur In Session.Contents
Response.Write ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur & " = " &
Session(ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur) & "<br>"
Next
Ray at work
E
Evertjan.
Aaron wrote on 27 okt 2003 in microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
<% For each d in Session.Contents %>
<%=d%>
=
<%=Session.Contents(d)%>
<br>
<% Next %>
<% For each d in Session.Contents %>
<%=d%>
=
<%=Session.Contents(d)%>
<br>
<% Next %>
A
Aaron
thanks.
Evertjan. said:
A
Aaron
just wondering ... why ajs8ejfajshdfklhas734ur ???? 
R
Ray at
Ah, I'm just fed up with x, n, i, j, q, etc. ;]
Ray at work
Ray at work
R
Ray at
This isn't really an issue with IIS5 and higher.
Ray at work
Ray at work
E
Evertjan.
Peter Foti wrote on 27 okt 2003 in
microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
I agree it is inefficient in CPU time and before IIS 5. The searching for
an unknown sesssionvariable name as such is terribly inefficient, as you
should know that in your own environment. If you get an unknown session
variable, how the hell would you know what to do with it, code wise?
But it is very efficient educational wise,
as, in my view, it is much easier to see the code flow
than with response.write and lots of &&& and """.
And as this code will probably only be used in an debugging environment,
the cpu efficiency is rather or rather completely unimportant.
microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
I agree it is inefficient in CPU time and before IIS 5. The searching for
an unknown sesssionvariable name as such is terribly inefficient, as you
should know that in your own environment. If you get an unknown session
variable, how the hell would you know what to do with it, code wise?
But it is very efficient educational wise,
as, in my view, it is much easier to see the code flow
than with response.write and lots of &&& and """.
And as this code will probably only be used in an debugging environment,
the cpu efficiency is rather or rather completely unimportant.
J
Jason Chan
Ray at said:
H
Harag
Ray could you explain why its not an issue with iis5+ or at least
point us to some urls exaplaining why.
I was looking at a site called "coveryourasp.com" which says that
switching between asp & html is a bad thing and that he does his site
all using response.write (or a cutdown version called "Out", example
below)
What you think to this sort of design for the site? please take a look
at his and let me know your thoughts.
Al.
SUB out (sText)
response.write sText
END SUB
Out "<html><title></title><body>"
out "<table>"
out "<tr><th>head1</th><th>head2</th></tr>
out "<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>
out "<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>
out "<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>
out "</table>"
Out "</body></html>"
etc
point us to some urls exaplaining why.
I was looking at a site called "coveryourasp.com" which says that
switching between asp & html is a bad thing and that he does his site
all using response.write (or a cutdown version called "Out", example
below)
What you think to this sort of design for the site? please take a look
at his and let me know your thoughts.
Al.
SUB out (sText)
response.write sText
END SUB
Out "<html><title></title><body>"
out "<table>"
out "<tr><th>head1</th><th>head2</th></tr>
out "<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>
out "<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>
out "<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>
out "</table>"
Out "</body></html>"
etc
R
Ray at
Harag said:
I don't have any links. This is just one of those things that I've heard
enough times that I've chosen to believe it. I do believe that I've seen
links about some differences betweeh IIS4 and 5 and why and how 5+ handles
things differently.
I like both ways. And I like to know [believe] that I can choose either way
without it mattering. I use both ways depending on the situation. If I
just need to response.write "<option>" & val & "</option>", I'll often
response.write it. But if I'm throwing asp vars into what is mostly html, I
will <%= %> it in the html.
Ray at work