mod_python performs several magnitudes slower than PHP?

C

chris.monsanto

Recently I've had to move my site to a new dedicated server running
FreeBSD 6.1. After installing apache 2.0.59, python 2.4.4 and
mod_python 3.3.1, I decided to bench a script in PHP vs one in Python.
I found out that for some reason, my mod_python was performing
extremely slow - magnitudes slower than it should. I scowered the
internet for hours and asked a few friends and still haven't been able
to find a solution to the problem.

from mod_python import apache

def handler(req):
for i in xrange(1000):
print >> req, "Yeah"
return apache.OK

and...

<?
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000; $i++)
echo "Yeah\n" ;
?>

when I ran ab on both using 1000 requests and a concurrency of 10, i
got these results:

python- Requests per second: 21.37 [#/sec] (mean)
php- Requests per second: 1008.37 [#/sec] (mean)

Any ideas would really be appreciated... I'm on my last leg.
 
J

John Nagle

That's puzzling, because with mod_python, you're only invoking
the compiler once per Apache restart. With CGI programs, you pay
the loading penalty on every request.

John Nagle
 
G

Graham Dumpleton

That's puzzling, because withmod_python, you're only invoking
the compiler once per Apache restart. With CGI programs, you pay
the loading penalty on every request.

John Nagle

Recently I've had to move my site to a new dedicated server running
FreeBSD 6.1. After installing apache 2.0.59, python 2.4.4 and
mod_python3.3.1, I decided to bench a script in PHP vs one in Python.
I found out that for some reason, mymod_pythonwas performing
extremely slow - magnitudes slower than it should. I scowered the
internet for hours and asked a few friends and still haven't been able
to find a solution to the problem.
frommod_pythonimport apache
def handler(req):
for i in xrange(1000):
print >> req, "Yeah"
return apache.OK

<?
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000; $i++)
echo "Yeah\n" ;
?>
when I ran ab on both using 1000 requests and a concurrency of 10, i
got these results:
python- Requests per second: 21.37 [#/sec] (mean)
php- Requests per second: 1008.37 [#/sec] (mean)
Any ideas would really be appreciated... I'm on my last leg.

The original poster also asked the same question on the mod_python
mailing list. As pointed out there, the examples aren't equivalent as
the mod_python example would have resulted in data being flushed to
the client after every call to 'print'.

A more suitable example for comparison would have been:

def handler(req):
for i in xrange(1000):
req.write('Yeah\n, 0)
return apache.OK

The second argument of 0 to req.write() will allow Apache to buffer
data in an appropriate way and avoid lots of socket writes with small
amounts of data, plus avoid triggering of Apache's filter mechanism
every time.

Graham
 
W

Winfried Tilanus

On 05/20/2007 Graham Dumpleton wrote:

Hi,
A more suitable example for comparison would have been:

And are there any benchmarks with this new version available? Just
curious...

best wishes,

Winfried
 
G

Graham Dumpleton

On 05/20/2007 Graham Dumpleton wrote:

Hi,


And are there any benchmarks with this new version available? Just
curious...

Unless someone else posts that specific example comparing it to PHP on
the same system, then you might instead look at:

http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2007-May/023654.html

This shows the original posters Python example compared to another way
of doing it, not what I posted, which would be even quicker, ie.,
using Python itself to do the buffering.

Do note that such benchmarks are pretty meaningless as you will never
achieve such throughputs once you actually load on top your Django,
TurboGears, Pylons or other mega web framework application. Such
applications are huge and carry a lot of overhead which dwarfs any
overhead of mod_python itself.

Graham
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,580
Members
45,055
Latest member
SlimSparkKetoACVReview

Latest Threads

Top