Non-virtual destructors & valarray memory allocation

[Michael Hopkins]

Hi all

A couple of questions that are influencing the design of some classes.


1) Why were the std:: library containers not given virtual destructors - is
this a feature or an oversight? If the latter, I wonder if it would be
something that could be changed easily in the upcoming standard without
breaking current code.

We would like to derive publicly from them in a couple of cases and now have
to be more disciplined than we should need to be about how we use those
types.


2) Is there any way of declaring e.g. two valarray<double> so that they are
guaranteed to be contiguous in memory? i.e.

class V {
std::valarray<double> v1, v2;
}


TIA and please CC replies to this address

Michael


_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

_/ _/ _/_/_/ Hopkins Research Ltd
_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ http://www.hopkins-research.com/
_/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ 'touch the future'

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

 

[Kai-Uwe Bux]

Hi all

A couple of questions that are influencing the design of some classes.


1) Why were the std:: library containers not given virtual destructors -
is
this a feature or an oversight? If the latter, I wonder if it would be
something that could be changed easily in the upcoming standard without
breaking current code.

We would like to derive publicly from them in a couple of cases and now
have to be more disciplined than we should need to be about how we use
those types.

There is an easy fix:

template < typename T >
class inheritable_vector : public std::vector<T> {

inheritable_vector ( void )
: std::vector<T>()
{}

template < typename A >
inheritable_vector ( A a )
: std::vector<T>( a )
{}

// ... more constructors

virtual
~inheritable_vector ( void ) {}

};

Now, inheritable_vector<T> has a virtual destructor, it has the same
interface as std::vector<T>, and you can use pointers to
inheritable_vector<T> polymorphically. Just never use std::vector (which is
easy to ensure using grep and easy to patch using awk) and you are fine.

2) Is there any way of declaring e.g. two valarray<double> so that they
are guaranteed to be contiguous in memory? i.e.

class V {
std::valarray<double> v1, v2;
}

I don't think so. Maybe, there are platform specific ways.



Best

Kai-Uwe Bux