Sorry, it was too early to release it

[jacob navia]

As many of you have noticed, I have done everything wrongf with this
"release" of teh code of the container library:

(1) I mixed up the files when posting and I posted a wrong version of
the software instead of the correct one.

(2) I have been working "porting" the software and eliminating
all lcc-specifics What I should have known obviously is that
I could introduce BUGS this way and I should test everything
again. For instance,
lcc-win accepts references that are pointers that you
access with the '.' notation. To easy the port, I replaced
this with a pass by value of a list structure.

BUT obviously too, if I pass by value a structure, it
can't be modified in the called function, so functions like
Add() fail to update the count of the list.

I apologize to everybody here for the time lost. I need to get
back to the drawing board, pass ALL the unit tests, and document
everything AGAIN...

Again, I apologize to everybody for the trouble I may have provoked.

jacob

 

[David RF]

Again, I apologize to everybody for the trouble I may have provoked.

No troubles at least for me, but (since is a large piece of code), why
don't you use a pastebin? p.e http://codepad.org/

 

[Flash Gordon]

jacob navia wrote:

Again, I apologize to everybody for the trouble I may have provoked.

Honest mistakes happen and are not a problem.

 

[Flash Gordon]

In


No archives.

Also at least some people are less likely to go there to grab the code
than to simply grab it off the post.

I don't think Jacob's code was too large for posting here.

 

[user923005]

As many of you have noticed, I have done everything wrongf with this
"release" of teh code of the container library:

(1) I mixed up the files when posting and I posted a wrong version of
the software instead of the correct one.

(2) I have been working "porting" the software and eliminating
    all lcc-specifics What I should have known obviously is that
    I could introduce BUGS this way and I should test everything
    again. For instance,
    lcc-win accepts references that are pointers that you
    access with the '.' notation. To easy the port, I replaced
    this with a pass by value of a list structure.

    BUT obviously too, if I pass by value a structure, it
    can't be modified in the called function, so functions like
    Add() fail to update the count of the list.

I apologize to everybody here for the time lost. I need to get
back to the drawing board, pass ALL the unit tests, and document
everything AGAIN...

Again, I apologize to everybody for the trouble I may have provoked.

It prompted some intersting discussion.

Once it is completed, it seems a very useful tool set.