C
Chris Torek
Chris Torek said:
Close enough to make a big mess, certainly.
One might wish for the same with regard to setjmp(). Or perhaps
longjmp() -- setjmp() without longjmp() is quite harmless.
setjmp comes pretty close, doesn't it?
Close enough to make a big mess, certainly.
...and its prohibition almost invariably appears on page 1 of any COBOL
in-house coding standards document.
One might wish for the same with regard to setjmp(). Or perhaps
longjmp() -- setjmp() without longjmp() is quite harmless.