Rajinder Yadav wrote in post #958380:
May I ask why 'ruby.exe example1.rb' when 'example1.rb' alone is
sufficient?
beginner here =) no knowledge whatsoever.
i'm using windows xp, what i do is:
c:
c:\Ruby192\Practice (that's where i keep my sample program)
then type example1.rb
and it works exactly like the 'ruby.exe example1.rb'
It works because there must be a file association for files with the .rb
extension to be run by ruby.exe. Windows is a bit special in this
regard. Unix systems handle associating scripts with programs in a
different way that is not supported under Windows. Too bad too, because
the Unix way is much more flexible.
For instance, I can name a file myscript.jeremy and configure it so that
it will be run with Ruby, Python, Perl, or some other interpreter of my
choosing. I could then create another file named myotherscript.jeremy
and set it up to run using a completely different interpreter.
This is not possible under Windows. The .jeremy extension can only be
associated with a single program, so one of those files would have to be
run by manually calling the correct program with the file as an argument.
but I was just wondering why you suggested that. is it a conventional
way or something? I'm still not sure why ruby.exe exists in the bin
folder, I find testing programs in command prompt a lot easier....and i
don't feel like using SciTE.exe (text editor) either....
The ruby.exe file is the program that runs, or interprets, Ruby scripts
on your system. Without ruby.exe, your scripts cannot run. As a quick
experiment, rename ruby.exe to ruby.exe.bak and then try running your
script. Unless you have a different ruby.exe than the one you renamed
configured to run your scripts, you should get a nice error.
Keep in mind that none of this is unique to Ruby. If you install Python
or Perl, you'll find they have python.exe and perl.exe files in their
respective bin directories as well.
-Jeremy
