QUOTE
Arrays *are* objects.
UNQUOTE
We can say even more, expert of my balls.
Nothing is an object.
Objects are an abstraction to mean data structures. "OBJECTS", they do
not EVEN exist.
Study some C, expert.
QUOTE
Do not think of object properties as 'keys', they are properties.
UNQUOTE
QUOTING MYSELF
As such, it is a collection of PROPERTIES.
UNQUOTING MYSELF
I can't see how i could have said it more clearly than the way i did,
capitalizing it.
If even capitalizing a thing makes you suppose it escaped my attention,
I wonder why the hack *I* am here answering to you. You have a
perception issue.
I can't see why to say such banal thing you had to quote me LOL- I
myself used the terms keys and property as basically interchangeable.
They are not so, only in your world where you spend your time counting
how many hairs are on a butt.
QUOTE
Yet if you'd loop it as an array
for(var i=0; i<a.length;i++){alert((typeof i)+' '+(typeof a))}
that will rerturn NUMBER NUMBER
That doesn't prove anything, i is declared as a number and nothing is
done to change its type.
UNQUOTE
how ridiculous. I said the VERY same thing. As if after 10 years of
javascript i need an idiot like you to teach me that if I initialize a
variable as a Number, that reports number. I was addressing a potential
BEGINNER, moron.
How stupid and obtuse you are. I was just trying to make a beginner see
how a few things may differ THOUGH being apparently the same thing.
You're here arguing I didn't simplye because I used other words than
yours.
Get laid, or look after ur wife more often. It was not meant to "PROVE"
anything, was just a way to show to a beginner that everyhting is a
data structure (Call it object, who cares, it's a rose by another
name).
If you would be more confident about yoruself, you won't have to show a
limp dick trying to make up for it with a flaccid post. The next time
you have to make your point, you can make it avoinding to mention
persons who were saying the very same thing that you were saying with
your own words.
QUOTE
The ECMAScript Language Specification states that all object properties
are strings.
Experimentation should not required to discover it,
UNQUOTE
what an idiot., a person who hints he could be a BEGINNER has NOT read
the ECMA specification, moron. He wants to see things explained and
proved HERE and NOW not on a manual that only you and me and a few
other idiots read.
EVERY TIME I LAND ON A GROUP I INVARIBALY FIND SOME DEFICIENT WHO
ARGUES ABOUT THE WRONG POINTS. We had a beginner here. He did NOT read
the ecma specification. He was asking for EXPLANATIONS here and now. I
am not "proving" it to you, dement, I was proving it, as you implicitly
state, to a BEGINNER. The post was not for you.
When you want to show how good you are, show it to you wife. Ganfg of
assholes, EVERYTIME one helps SOMEONE else, they have to get in with
their rebuttals based on NOTHING or on the WRONG assumptions
keys, properties. I said the same thing. Ecma specification, dement
have you everv tried to teach to a beginner? bEGINNER DON'RT EVEN KNOW
ECMA EXISTS.
I sensed it IMMEDIATLE as soon as I saw pointed ears that this group
had to be the very same collection of idiots it has always been. I am
so PISSEDD off that I can't even make a contriobution to a person who
is a beginner without seeing a completelypointless rebuttal, that I
have no scruple in calling you the names you deserve. MGet this
deleted, Sue me,. **** yourself most of all.