L
Lax
Isn't it "technically" meaningless to call C a "row major language,"
since there are no such things as multidimensional arrays in C.
In C you can define arrays of arrays, and the way that the
declarations work (first index closest to identifier defines the
largest arrays) makes it seems like C has row-major multidimensional
arrays
No need to mention "row major" when discussing C if one talks about
"arrays of arrays" and the way C's declarations work "inside to
out." Correct, no?
And thanks to Ian Collins and Walter Robinson for your help with my
previous post (on 'static' externals).
since there are no such things as multidimensional arrays in C.
In C you can define arrays of arrays, and the way that the
declarations work (first index closest to identifier defines the
largest arrays) makes it seems like C has row-major multidimensional
arrays
No need to mention "row major" when discussing C if one talks about
"arrays of arrays" and the way C's declarations work "inside to
out." Correct, no?
And thanks to Ian Collins and Walter Robinson for your help with my
previous post (on 'static' externals).