Twisted PB vs JMS

J

jacopo

I looked at Twisted PB for an architecture with one client
distributing some processing to several servers. Now I came across JMS
and I have seen that using ActiveMQ with the Stomp protocol there
would be a good support for Python.
Surprising I couldn’t find any article comparing the two
technologies. I wonder if they target different problems (it doesn’t
look to me).

Is anyone able to sketch advantages of one solution against the other?

Thanks,
Jacopo
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,786
Messages
2,569,626
Members
45,328
Latest member
66Teonna9

Latest Threads

Top