Where can I find the C function library source ?

[Tera]

can you please give me the link ?

 

[Flash Gordon]

can you please give me the link ?

This is not a chat room, don't repost your question if it is not
answered immediately.

Also, please put the entire question in the body, don't leave half of it
only in the subject.

Read the group and it's FAQ (and for groups with a charter read the
charter) before posting, this would have shown you that this is not a
"sources wanted" group but a groups about programming in standard C.

When posting provide sufficient information that people stand some vague
chance of helping you. On my systems I can often find the C sources in a
tarball in /usr/portage/distfiles but that is unlikely to help you.

A slightly more helpful answer is that it depends entirely on your OS
*and* the C implementation you are using, since each combination can use
entirely different source code for the standard C library, and in some
cases that source code will not be made available. So I suggest you try
using Google and if that does not help asking in a group dedicated to
your specific system after checking their FAQ, charter and at least a
few days worth of posts.

 

[Skybuck Flying]

Look up her/his e-mail address: (e-mail address removed)

Tera has been posting in chinese/japanse or something mostly.

I doubt he/she will understand your typical frustrated c programmer bullshit
below =D

Bye,
Skybuck.

 

[Tera]

I'am so sorry.The speed of my network is slow.So I don't know I have
sent it out.
I have come to apologize to you.

 

[Tera]

I'm writing a OS,just for a experiment.At the beginning, I write it
with assemble.But now I find it is too hard,so I wanna use C...
Skybuck Flying,you make me unpleased.My English is poor,but i know what
you mean
at least.

 

[Flash Gordon]

I'm writing a OS,just for a experiment.At the beginning, I write it
with assemble.But now I find it is too hard,so I wanna use C...
Skybuck Flying,you make me unpleased.My English is poor,but i know what
you mean
at least.

I believe the Skybuck Flying is not highly regarded around here, so you
can ignore him/her without loosing anything worth noting.

Being poor at English is not a problem as long as it is understandable
and I at least can understand your posts.

The C library contains a lot of system specific code, so you will have
to write significant parts of it yourself. Mr Plauger's book is highly
regarded and would be a good reference for this.

We will be happy to help you with your C programming issues, but you
will have to ask on a group dedicated to your hardware or possibly
comp.arch.embedded when you need to use non-standard tricks such as
addressing the hardware directly.

 

[Default User]

I'am so sorry.The speed of my network is slow.So I don't know I have
sent it out.
I have come to apologize to you.

A further thing you need to know for participating here is to quote
enough of the previous message to provide context for your reply. To do
so from Google, click on "show options" and use the Reply shown in the
expanded header.



Brian

 

[Tera]

OK,thank yuo all.

 

[Keith Thompson]

OK,thank yuo all.

Ah, irony.

Here's the text of the article to which you just replied:

] Tera wrote:
]
] > I'am so sorry.The speed of my network is slow.So I don't know I have
] > sent it out.
] > I have come to apologize to you.
]
] A further thing you need to know for participating here is to quote
] enough of the previous message to provide context for your reply. To do
] so from Google, click on "show options" and use the Reply shown in the
] expanded header.
]
]
]
] Brian

Please follow Brian's advice.

 

[Tera]

Keith Thompson 写é“：

OK,thank yuo all.

Ah, irony.

Here's the text of the article to which you just replied:

] Tera wrote:
]
] > I'am so sorry.The speed of my network is slow.So I don't know I have
] > sent it out.
] > I have come to apologize to you.
]
] A further thing you need to know for participating here is to quote
] enough of the previous message to provide context for your reply. To do
] so from Google, click on "show options" and use the Reply shown in the
] expanded header.
]
]
]
] Brian

Please follow Brian's advice.

like this ?

 

[Keith Thompson]

Keith Thompson 写é“：

OK,thank yuo all.

Ah, irony.

Here's the text of the article to which you just replied:

] Tera wrote:
]
] > I'am so sorry.The speed of my network is slow.So I don't know I have
] > sent it out.
] > I have come to apologize to you.
]
] A further thing you need to know for participating here is to quote
] enough of the previous message to provide context for your reply. To do
] so from Google, click on "show options" and use the Reply shown in the
] expanded header.
]
]
]
] Brian

Please follow Brian's advice.

like this ?

Well, sort of. Yes, you've found the proper 'Reply' button, but you
should also delete anything from the previous article that's not
relevant to your reply. In particular, don't quote signatures unless
you're actually commenting on them. And how did my e-mail address get
mangled in the attribution line?

 

[Old Wolf]

And how did my e-mail address get mangled in the attribution line?

I'm not sure what you get on your screen, but on mine it says:

Keith Thompson XY:

where 'X' and 'Y' are Chinese characters, which I presume have
the meaning of 'wrote'.

 

[Richard Tobin]

And how did my e-mail address get
mangled in the attribution line?

There are nine bytes there corresponding (in UTF-8) to two Chinese or
Japanese characters followed by a double-width colon.

-- Richard

 

[Tera]

And how did my e-mail address get
mangled in the attribution line?

I'am not sure what you mean about this.

 

[Tera]

I'm not sure what you get on your screen, but on mine it says:

Keith Thompson XY:

where 'X' and 'Y' are Chinese characters, which I presume have
the meaning of 'wrote'.

Yes,I'am Chinese. On my screen,there are English and Chinese
words.Sometimes,"wrote:" can be "写é“：" in Chinese.

 

[Martin Ambuhl]

I'm not sure what you get on your screen, but on mine it says:

Keith Thompson XY:

where 'X' and 'Y' are Chinese characters, which I presume have
the meaning of 'wrote'.

They are simplified Chinese characters:

写 (xie): write
é“ (dao): Dao, road, path; *to say*

 

[Mabden]

And how did my e-mail address get
mangled in the attribution line?

This is Off Topic in comp.lang.c.

 

[Keith Thompson]

This is Off Topic in comp.lang.c.

I see you've been posting a lot today. Unless I've missed something,
you have said *nothing* topical. A little joking around is ok, but
could you *try* to talk about C? Maybe you could start by shooting
for a 50% topicality ratio.

 

[Mabden]

I see you've been posting a lot today. Unless I've missed something,
you have said *nothing* topical.

Did too! I said you couldn't embed an object file in C source!
Hey! you're the one posting off-topic here - asking about Chinese
characters. Here's a site that would have helped you find that info:
http://www.fuckinggoogleit.com/

A little joking around is ok, but
could you *try* to talk about C? Maybe you could start by shooting
for a 50% topicality ratio.

Again, couldn't you *TRY* to say that in a Haiku or something Zen-like?

"The vast sea lets fish leap freely; the endless sky lets birds fly
freely; the wind has no moment."

I know you are clueless, so I will 'splain some of the allegory:
Sea = C, endless sky = internet / newsgroups, wind = well, you figure it
out...

 

[Mabden]

A little joking around is ok, but
could you *try* to talk about C?

Honestly, I don't know how you can answer the same crappy questions and
homework questions and pointer questions, day after day after day... ad
infinitum. Yet you have been doing a great job in doing so for years.

My hat is off to you, Keith, for your patience, understanding, and
willingness to work with early beginners. You are level-headed, and step
in to give the correct facts. You are cordial and thorough,
knowledgeable and nice. I admire you, and I truly believe you are akin
to Howard Cosell as an irreplaceable resource in comp.lang.c. Well done,
my friend, well done.

I pop in for a few weeks, take a look around, sniper a few idiots, and I
have to leave; it's just the same old crap. There must be decades of the
same boring, trivial, homework type programs that no one would really do
in the Real World. And any of them could just Google the same question
they are about to post and get 500 responses - many that actually DO the
homework!

I also have a problem with training up the very people who are taking
our jobs away. When I see these overseas posts that want to drain our
brains so they can better steal our jobs, I wonder at the people
answering the questions. This is a serious problem. In another thread
there was talk about stealing because someone put a book online. How
about the fact that you are helping the person who took my job
online...?! I know the answer to the question, and you know the answer,
but the person making $1.50 in India or China doesn't know the answer -
so let's use our 20 years experience to help them steal our jobs. I say,
"OSHI!" (When Mussolini asked Greece to join the Nazis, the Greek
ruler's one word answer was, "No!" They have a National Holiday about
it)

I would like to see some interesting C questions or debates (remember
the NULL vs 0 vs location 0 vs embedded devices not having a location 0,
etc. discussion we had; that was meaningful, interesting, and topical) I
just don't see anything like that when I check in (and I check in more
than I post, BTW) and after a while I just want to stir things up in
here to try to get something or someone interesting to comment.

I guess that when I see the forum doing the kids' homework for them, and
stupid questions about converting integers to floats or something, I
just want to post something irreverent to break up the monotony. Then I
get grief from people like you and it sucks the fun out of it... Please
lighten up. You can't prevent my humorous jocularity, and at most you
can only scold after the fact. Or you could just ignore it. I would
never want you to killfile me, and if it ever enters your mind
(...again?) please let me know first, as I DO appreciate your comments,
mostly...

Keith, you could take a page out of the book of ... duh duh duh dum ...
(seriously concerned about invoking the name... <shiver>) ... Dan Pop.
HE jumps upon the unrighteous with swift and sure Justice, however not
over trivial things; you must incur the wrath of the Pop. You are much
more free with your critisms over a cute "bon mot" or turn of phrase.
Perhaps you should get laid more often...