Found a grammar error in PEP 5. How to suggest correction?

[Aseem Bansal]

In PEP 5 it is

4. Add an an optional warning mode to the parser that will inform

There are 2 `an`s here. How to suggest a correction for this?

 

[Joel Goldstick]

In PEP 5 it is

4. Add an an optional warning mode to the parser that will inform

There are 2 `an`s here. How to suggest a correction for this?

You already asked this question. Here is your answer:
http://docs.python.org/2/bugs.html#documentation-bugs shows this:

f you find a bug in this documentation or would like to propose an
improvement, please send an e-mail to (e-mail address removed) describing the
bug and where you found it. If you have a suggestion how to fix it,
include that as well.
(e-mail address removed) is a mailing list run by volunteers; your request will
be noticed, even if it takes a while to be processed.
Of course, if you want a more persistent record of your issue, you can
use the issue tracker for documentation bugs as well.

By the way, I found this link by going to google and searching for
"how to submit documentation bug to python.org"

Come on Aseem. Pick up your game a little bit. You actually have the
opportunity to get the documentation changed for the better, or you
can just keep asking the same question.

 

[Aseem Bansal]

@Joel Goldstick

That is the documentation and this is about the PEP. I didn't realize that the same works for both. I'll do that.

 

[Terry Reedy]

In PEP 5 it is

4. Add an an optional warning mode to the parser that will inform

There are 2 `an`s here.
Fixed.

How to suggest a correction for this?

You just did. If this list does not work, or for non-trivial
suggestions, go to bugs.python.org or email (e-mail address removed). See
http://docs.python.org/3/bugs.html

 

[Joel Goldstick]

You just did. If this list does not work, or for non-trivial suggestions, go
to bugs.python.org or email (e-mail address removed). See
http://docs.python.org/3/bugs.html

Hey Terry, Aseem! that's great!

 

[Aseem Bansal]

@ Terry Jan Reedy, @Joel Goldstick

The problem with that documentation link is that it says the bugs in that documentation should be mailed at that e-mail address. But the PEPs are not the part of the documentation. I am saying that PEPs are not its part because when I downloaded the documentation it did not contain the PEPs.

So the information in the documentation is misleading because it doesn't include the PEPs in the downloaded version but the e-mail address is used to accept PEP bugs according to you people.

peps at python dot org
is the e-mail suggested in PEP1 for contacting the PEP editors. I e-mailed there and got a reply.