Generally, are the programs written by C++ slower than written by C10% ?

[Miles Bader]

Indeed. As I said, that's how things work on Linux.

Ah, ok; I thought when you said "this isn't true for my experience of
Linux with gcc", you were _disagreeing_ with what I said...

-Miles

 

[Joshua Maurice]

Indeed. As I said, that's how things work on Linux.

Ah, ok; I thought when you said "this isn't true for my experience of
Linux with gcc", you were _disagreeing_ with what I said...

-Miles

--
"An atheist doesn't have to be someone who thinks he has a proof that
there can't be a god.  He only has to be someone who believes that the
evidence on the God question is at a similar level to the evidence on
the werewolf question."  [John McCarthy]

Ah, my mistake. I totally wrote that in a way that the wrong thing was
said. My apologies.

 

[Jorgen Grahn]

On 09/ 9/11 04:39 PM, BGB wrote:

....

[copy & paste programming]

Just like the standard library!

I mostly disagree with "BGB", but there *is* an additional cost in
making some piece of code reusable and making a library out of it.
(The cost of doing it well, or the cost of doing it badly.)

/Jorgen