J
John Bokma
John W. Kennedy said:No, I think your mom is waiting for websites coded by the competent.
We're all human after all. I am afraid that making sure that each and
every piece of code coming out of a program is 100% well formed. (Sounds
like solving the halting problem to me).
A verbal quibble to pass off Microsoft's vicious behavior as
acceptable, and you know it.
IMO, w3c is wrong with wasting time on a "standard" that will never make
it (I call *that* incompetence). They *should* focus on improving HTML,
not dreaming up something that no webmaster is ever going to use, *unless*
UA's are able to handle non-well-formed documents.
And I am sure UA's are not going to be made to choke on each and every
document that's not well-formed, so there goes the XHTML dream.
Computers are here, IMNSO, to make life easier. Giving no output because
someone made a typing error is just plain crazy in an end user situation.
It's like selling an email client which rejects all email with a spelling
mistake.