named tuple mutability

[castironpi]

I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named?

 

[Raymond Hettinger]

 Should tuples be named?

Yes.

 

[castironpi]

Yes.

Not clearly should. Sequences ought be. If you're on the right time
for both, can't the library hold the B?

 

[castironpi]

Not clearly should.  Sequences ought be.  If you're on the right time
for both, can't the library hold the B?

On the web, you can. Both data types can go in the docs... sorry for
the lunacy, I'm hacking.

 

[bruno.desthuilliers]

I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named?

Obviously not, unless they should.

 

[castironpi]

Clearly they should, unless not.

Ben Finney

I have plenty of uses for them!

 

[castironpi]

I have plenty of uses for them!

FOR INSTANCE!

def zoop_zoop_zoop( self ): pass

 

[castironpi]

Yes.

Good; they're named sequences.

 

[castironpi]

Good; they're named sequences.

Can anyone make sling-shots of words? What's the splatter?

 

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Ben Finney a écrit :

Clearly they should, unless not.

May we agree to disagree here - unless we don't ?

 

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Ben Finney a écrit :

Absolutely not, except where not applicable.

and vice versa.