R
rickyt
I've a question and a story to explain it, both of which are
unlikely to be topical, but one never knows. Posting here
because it's the only NG I've access to that might have an
answer.
I work in a software house as a tech writer. My cube is in
the block next to the coder's bullpen, so I sometimes hear
their discussions. I listen automatically because I have to
be authoritative on the terminology, and never know when I'll
hear something useful in any case.
One fellow, an outside contractor programmer who shows up on
a regular basis and takes part in these discussions, is always
noticeable because he has a high nasal drawl that is somewhat
irritating and difficult to ignore. He likes to run on and on
about programming languages and especially C and C++.
A week or so ago I heard a word in his monologue that I've
not heard before: "plunger". In context, it seemed to be a
reference of some sort, maybe for C or C++ language standards.
Thing is, I'm not sure I heard the word correctly. It could
have been "plugger", given his nasal twang. End of part one.
Yesterday I was looking at a recent copy of CUJ and ran across
an editorial by P.J. Plauger, recommending the Usenet as an
undervalued source of information. He listed the C and C++
oriented groups as those he read regularly, and said that he
tries to stay disciplined as a lurker, but occasionally does
contribute as well.
So I was sitting there looking at his signature and several
things occured to me at once. 1) I've no idea how he
pronounces his name. 2) The word I heard as "plunger/plugger"
might actually have been Plauger, which would explain the
context in which it was used. 3) The nasal voiced programmer
may or may not know how to pronounce "Plauger". Like me, he
may never have heard the name spoken. 4) As Mr. Plauger reads
here regularly, maybe he would be so kind as to provide a
phonetic rendering of his name.
Or maybe there is in fact such a term that I've never read
or heard before.
Whatever the case, I do find that lurking here is often useful,
but will probably not have reason to post again. Apologies to
those who find this post objectionable.
Thanks for any useful responses.
RJT
unlikely to be topical, but one never knows. Posting here
because it's the only NG I've access to that might have an
answer.
I work in a software house as a tech writer. My cube is in
the block next to the coder's bullpen, so I sometimes hear
their discussions. I listen automatically because I have to
be authoritative on the terminology, and never know when I'll
hear something useful in any case.
One fellow, an outside contractor programmer who shows up on
a regular basis and takes part in these discussions, is always
noticeable because he has a high nasal drawl that is somewhat
irritating and difficult to ignore. He likes to run on and on
about programming languages and especially C and C++.
A week or so ago I heard a word in his monologue that I've
not heard before: "plunger". In context, it seemed to be a
reference of some sort, maybe for C or C++ language standards.
Thing is, I'm not sure I heard the word correctly. It could
have been "plugger", given his nasal twang. End of part one.
Yesterday I was looking at a recent copy of CUJ and ran across
an editorial by P.J. Plauger, recommending the Usenet as an
undervalued source of information. He listed the C and C++
oriented groups as those he read regularly, and said that he
tries to stay disciplined as a lurker, but occasionally does
contribute as well.
So I was sitting there looking at his signature and several
things occured to me at once. 1) I've no idea how he
pronounces his name. 2) The word I heard as "plunger/plugger"
might actually have been Plauger, which would explain the
context in which it was used. 3) The nasal voiced programmer
may or may not know how to pronounce "Plauger". Like me, he
may never have heard the name spoken. 4) As Mr. Plauger reads
here regularly, maybe he would be so kind as to provide a
phonetic rendering of his name.
Or maybe there is in fact such a term that I've never read
or heard before.
Whatever the case, I do find that lurking here is often useful,
but will probably not have reason to post again. Apologies to
those who find this post objectionable.
Thanks for any useful responses.
RJT