R
Richard Heathfield
Keith Thompson said:
Thank you.
It's certainly your right to hold that belief.
On at least two occasions recently, KM has posted articles that show a
certain degree of thought and common sense. I don't say I agree with what
he wrote on those occasions, and I don't even intend to dig them out to
remind myself of what he said, but they weren't the usual trolling
nonsense. So perhaps he /is/ showing early signs of gaining a clue or two.
Or perhaps not - it's a little early to tell.
Like you, I recognise the damage that trolls do to newsgroups. Unlike you, I
don't necessarily agree that replying to trolling is *always* a bad thing.
I will continue to take each article as it comes.
I appreciate the fact that you rarely respond to this particular troll.
Thank you.
I believe it would be better for the newsgroup if you *never* did so.
It's certainly your right to hold that belief.
If you really believe that engaging KM in conversation is somehow
better than completely ignoring him, I'm at a loss to understand how
you've reached that conclusion, and I would appreciate a clarification.
People can change (as we've seen here recently), but KM shows no
signs of doing so.
On at least two occasions recently, KM has posted articles that show a
certain degree of thought and common sense. I don't say I agree with what
he wrote on those occasions, and I don't even intend to dig them out to
remind myself of what he said, but they weren't the usual trolling
nonsense. So perhaps he /is/ showing early signs of gaining a clue or two.
Or perhaps not - it's a little early to tell.
Until and unless he does, I will ignore him, and
I advise everyone else to do the same. If directing this advice to
you really won't do any good, I'll stop.
Like you, I recognise the damage that trolls do to newsgroups. Unlike you, I
don't necessarily agree that replying to trolling is *always* a bad thing.
I will continue to take each article as it comes.