Kiki said:
This is a comp.lang.javascript discussion group and I haven't seen
your two pence buddy!
Then you need to learn to read plain English.
That was my issue with the guy before.
Huh? What "guy"? If you had bothered to read what I typed, and followed
the advice to read this groups FAQ then you would be quoting what it is
you are babbling in response to.
What's the point in judging someone's coding decision and question without
offering a suggestion to the solution or discuss possible solutions. I
know what a major hassle the pop-ups are but I wasn't asked to remove
them, I was asked to make this work!
Let me quote you what I said about this stupid popup idea you have:
<quote>
Besides, if you are stupid enough to try to implement a stupid idea,
then you deserve what you get.
</quote>
And what you probably deserve the most is an award and a termination
check for not being professional enough to explain the bad idea your
"boss" came up with.
But you also asked "How do I stop a popup blocker from blocking my
popup?" That is a question that you, and every porn/spammer on the web,
would love the answer to. But all it takes is a little common sense to
ask yourself "Why do they use a popup blocker?" and you get the answer:
"They don't want popups". And then you wonder "Why am I trying to force
something on my users that they explicitly don't want?"
And when I said about the vintage code, I wasn't referring to you or
to most of you. I was referring to my 50-year-old MD that all she
likes is pop-ups with all the essential info!!!
I can find no reference by you to "vintage code". I did see where you
said it was "required", when it isn't. But if you want confirmation on
an order, use a confirm() and popup blocker's will have *NO* impact on it.
I just don't see the point of calling someone you don't know, stupid,
especially when the previous email was not addressed to you.
1) I never called you stupid, I called your idea stupid.
2) This is Usenet, not email. Learn the difference.
The only suggestion that you've made was that my solution won't work!
It wasn't a "suggestion", it was a statement of fact. And before you
question it, search the c.l.j archives for "attachEvent cross browser".