E
Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi there.
I was searching some stuff about Ruby and found this:
http://www.cooper.com/alan/father_of_vb.html
There was a Ruby before "our" Ruby, and it's known as Visual Basic today!=
Jesus!
Something that worried me was these words:
"Because Microsoft owned exclusive rights to Ruby, they could do with it =
as they
pleased."
Argh! Is the actual "Ruby" name ok, regarding the mark stuff?
Some more links about that:
http://www.forestmoon.com/BIRTHofVB/BIRTHofVB.html
http://www.webword.com/interviews/cooper.html
http://www.code-magazine.com/Article.aspx?quickid=3D0405091
I saw some messages on the list about that on 2001:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/9971
but as Microsoft is buying patents like crazy since then, I'm wondering i=
f there
could be some danger to the Ruby language nowadays. Seems that there is n=
othing
about this on the USA trademark office, but ... btw, it only works with I=
E.
Best regards,
- --
Eust=E1quio "TaQ" Rangel
http://beam.to/taq
"Computing is not about computers any more. It is about living."
N. Negroponte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEMTF2b6UiZnhJiLsRAkgYAJ45Hug3QuzcoOQj6A6kX6bE+xMwkQCgqDFd
XMgmD/Qwm1uKzhV1YHBZg60=3D
=3DRqlF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi there.
I was searching some stuff about Ruby and found this:
http://www.cooper.com/alan/father_of_vb.html
There was a Ruby before "our" Ruby, and it's known as Visual Basic today!=
Jesus!
Something that worried me was these words:
"Because Microsoft owned exclusive rights to Ruby, they could do with it =
as they
pleased."
Argh! Is the actual "Ruby" name ok, regarding the mark stuff?
Some more links about that:
http://www.forestmoon.com/BIRTHofVB/BIRTHofVB.html
http://www.webword.com/interviews/cooper.html
http://www.code-magazine.com/Article.aspx?quickid=3D0405091
I saw some messages on the list about that on 2001:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/9971
but as Microsoft is buying patents like crazy since then, I'm wondering i=
f there
could be some danger to the Ruby language nowadays. Seems that there is n=
othing
about this on the USA trademark office, but ... btw, it only works with I=
E.
Best regards,
- --
Eust=E1quio "TaQ" Rangel
http://beam.to/taq
"Computing is not about computers any more. It is about living."
N. Negroponte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEMTF2b6UiZnhJiLsRAkgYAJ45Hug3QuzcoOQj6A6kX6bE+xMwkQCgqDFd
XMgmD/Qwm1uKzhV1YHBZg60=3D
=3DRqlF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----