[ANN] CGIAlt 0.0.1 released - an alternative library of 'cgi.rb'

M

makoto kuwata

I have released CGIAlt 0.0.1.
http://rubyforge.org/projects/cgiext/

CGIAlt is an alternative library of 'cgi.rb'.

* Compatible with 'cgi.rb' and CGI class
* Faster than 'cgi.rb'
* Available with CGIExt (which is an implementation of cgi.rb in C
extension)

The following is an example of benchmark.

cgi.rb CGIAlt CGIAlt
+CGIExt

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
require "cgi" (x1000) 13.16 7.89 ( 67%) 9.18
( 43%)
CGI#new (simple) (x100000) 20.34 14.53 ( 40%) 12.46
( 63%)
CGI#new (comple) (x100000) 26.62 20.10 ( 32%) 13.19
(102%)
CGI#header (simple) (x1000000) 12.68 6.05 (110%) 6.04
(110%)
CGI#header (complex) (x1000000) 43.52 36.26 ( 20%) 36.62
( 19%)


See http://cgiext.rubyforge.org/ for details.
 
A

ara.t.howard

I have released CGIAlt 0.0.1.
http://rubyforge.org/projects/cgiext/

CGIAlt is an alternative library of 'cgi.rb'.

* Compatible with 'cgi.rb' and CGI class
* Faster than 'cgi.rb'
* Available with CGIExt (which is an implementation of cgi.rb in C
extension)

The following is an example of benchmark.

cgi.rb CGIAlt CGIAlt
+CGIExt

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
require "cgi" (x1000) 13.16 7.89 ( 67%) 9.18
( 43%)
CGI#new (simple) (x100000) 20.34 14.53 ( 40%) 12.46
( 63%)
CGI#new (comple) (x100000) 26.62 20.10 ( 32%) 13.19
(102%)
CGI#header (simple) (x1000000) 12.68 6.05 (110%) 6.04
(110%)
CGI#header (complex) (x1000000) 43.52 36.26 ( 20%) 36.62
( 19%)


See http://cgiext.rubyforge.org/ for details.

any thoughts on why i'm not seeing any speedup with this:


#! /opt/local/bin/ruby
require 'rubygems'
require 'cgi'
require 'fcgi'
require 'cgiext'

start_time = Time::now

memory_session = Hash::new{|h,k| h[k] = {}}

FCGI::each_cgi do |cgi|
this_time = Time::now

# hack to get around ruby session bug
session = memory_session[[cgi.cookies
['_session_id']].compact.flatten.first]
last_time = session['last_time']
session['last_time'] = this_time

content = <<-html
<hr>
<b> START_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ start_time }</i>
<hr>
<b> THIS_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ this_time }</i>
<hr>
<b> LAST_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ last_time }</i>
<hr>
html

cgi.out { content }
end


??

cheers.



a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
 
M

makoto kuwata

Hi ara, thank you for trying CGIAlt and CGIExt.

I have released new version of CGIAlt (0.0.2).
It now supports FastCGI.
Could you try new one?

--
makoto kuwata


ara.t.howard said:
CGIAlt is an alternative library of 'cgi.rb'.
* Compatible with 'cgi.rb' and CGI class
* Faster than 'cgi.rb'
* Available with CGIExt (which is an implementation of cgi.rb in C
extension)
The following is an example of benchmark.
cgi.rb CGIAlt CGIAlt
+CGIExt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
require "cgi" (x1000) 13.16 7.89 ( 67%) 9.18
( 43%)
CGI#new (simple) (x100000) 20.34 14.53 ( 40%) 12.46
( 63%)
CGI#new (comple) (x100000) 26.62 20.10 ( 32%) 13.19
(102%)
CGI#header (simple) (x1000000) 12.68 6.05 (110%) 6.04
(110%)
CGI#header (complex) (x1000000) 43.52 36.26 ( 20%) 36.62
( 19%)
Seehttp://cgiext.rubyforge.org/for details.

any thoughts on why i'm not seeing any speedup with this:

#! /opt/local/bin/ruby
require 'rubygems'
require 'cgi'
require 'fcgi'
require 'cgiext'

start_time = Time::now

memory_session = Hash::new{|h,k| h[k] = {}}

FCGI::each_cgi do |cgi|
this_time = Time::now

# hack to get around ruby session bug
session = memory_session[[cgi.cookies
['_session_id']].compact.flatten.first]
last_time = session['last_time']
session['last_time'] = this_time

content = <<-html
<hr>
<b> START_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ start_time }</i>
<hr>
<b> THIS_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ this_time }</i>
<hr>
<b> LAST_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ last_time }</i>
<hr>
html

cgi.out { content }
end

??

cheers.

a @http://codeforpeople.com/
 
A

ara.t.howard

Hi ara, thank you for trying CGIAlt and CGIExt.

I have released new version of CGIAlt (0.0.2).
It now supports FastCGI.
Could you try new one?

sure.

can you confirm that, for cgi i should do

require 'cgialt'
require 'cgiext'

and, for fcgi

require 'cgialt'
require 'cgialt/fcgi'
require 'cgiext'

and that, in both cases, i do not need to require either cgi.rb or
fcgi.{so,rb} ??

cheers.

a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
 
A

ara.t.howard

Hi ara, thank you for trying CGIAlt and CGIExt.

I have released new version of CGIAlt (0.0.2).
It now supports FastCGI.
Could you try new one?


this is what i'm testing:

#! /opt/local/bin/ruby
require 'rubygems'
require 'cgialt'
require 'cgialt/fcgi'
require 'cgiext'

start_time = Time::now

memory_session = Hash::new{|h,k| h[k] = {}}

FCGI::each_cgi do |cgi|
this_time = Time::now

# hack to get around ruby session bug
session = memory_session[[cgi.cookies
['_session_id']].compact.flatten.first]
last_time = session['last_time']
session['last_time'] = this_time

content = <<-html
<hr>
<b> START_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ start_time }</i>
<hr>
<b> THIS_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ this_time }</i>
<hr>
<b> LAST_TIME </b> @ <i>#{ last_time }</i>
<hr>
html

cgi.out { content }
end




and i don't really see a huge improvement - but it's a very simply
program that may not take advantage of the performance features. can
you suggest a fcgi that should see a significant speedup?



a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
 
M

makoto kuwata

ara.t.howard said:
and i don't really see a huge improvement - but it's a very simply
program that may not take advantage of the performance features. can
you suggest a fcgi that should see a significant speedup?

CGIAlt and CGIExt are not the silver bullet for performance.
If CGI class and it's methods were bottle neck of your application,
CGIAlt and CGIExt would be good solution.
But if not, you can't find improvement of performance.


The following is an example of benchmarks. These benchmark scripts are
included in CGIAlt package and you can try them.


Table 1. summary of benchmark
cgi.rb CGIAlt CGIAlt
+CGIExt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
require "cgi" (x1000) 13.16 7.89 ( 67%) 9.18
( 43%)
CGI#new (simple) (x100000) 20.34 14.53 ( 40%) 12.46
( 63%)
CGI#new (comple) (x100000) 26.62 20.10 ( 32%) 13.19
(102%)
CGI#header (simple) (x1000000) 12.68 6.05 (110%) 6.04
(110%)
CGI#header (complex) (x1000000) 43.52 36.26 ( 20%) 36.62
( 19%)


Table 2. result of bench.fcgi
Time taken for tests Request per
second
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
cgi + fcgi 16.686 [sec] 1198.61 [#/
sec]
cgialt + cgialt/fcgi 15.562 [sec] 1285.18 [#/
sec]
cgialt + cgialt/fcgi + cgiext 15.310 [sec] 1306.34 [#/
sec]



CGIExt replaces CGI.escapeHTML and ERB::Util.h and makes them much
faster.
If you use a lot of '<%=h var %>', CGIExt will improve your
application's performance.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,777
Messages
2,569,604
Members
45,234
Latest member
SkyeWeems

Latest Threads

Top