B
BIG BOY
Sir I am little bit confused about Apache Web Server and Apache Tomcat
Server. Please give me an link so that i can find it out.
Server. Please give me an link so that i can find it out.
BIG said:Sir I am little bit confused about Apache Web Server and Apache Tomcat
Server. Please give me an link so that i can find it out.
Davide said:apache web server is a webserver.
tomcat is a servlet container.
Davide said:apache web server is a webserver.
tomcat is a servlet container.
In stand-alone mode, Tomcat can process servlets (and JSPs) and can
serve static content as well... And it does it *very* fast.
ok, but apache httpd is faster than tomcat and has a better virtual host
management.
usually people but tomcat behind apache with a connector ..
BIG said:Sir I am little bit confused about Apache Web Server and Apache Tomcat
Server. Please give me an link so that i can find it out.
Tom said:Bet you can't find supporting data for that (usually people put tomcat
behind apache with a connector). My bet would be that most small to
mid-sized sites don't. I have situations with both (actually I have a
third scenario with IIS in front of Tomcat as well) and see no
significant difference in response times. Then again I'm only talking
about dealing out thousands of pages a day. I'm sure that in a
high-volume app that would be different.
BIG said:Sir I am little bit confused about Apache Web Server and Apache Tomcat
Server. Please give me an link so that i can find it out.
Is that really true? Can I use Tomcat as a front end for PHP, PerlTom Cole said:Tomcat is a ... and if you want, all the stuff Apache does.
David said:Is that really true? Can I use Tomcat as a front end for PHP, Perl
etc? Does it have similar facilities for limiting access?
I would expect huge files to be sligthly faster in
Apache or IIS than by Tomcat.
Robert said:Why do you expect that? I'd rather expect the opposite because the time
for streaming a large file from disk to network is mostly determined by
IO and network bandwidth whereas for smaller files the overhead of HTTP
header processing etc. would make up a greater portion of overall
timing. Are there any optimizations in apache (caching the whole file?)
that will make it faster on large files?
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.