BartC said:
On usenet, .c and .c++ groups sound like the best bet for coming across
someone who's already tackled the problem.
A very good point, that is generally overlooked by the regs.
To put this in a clearer light, consider that one of the hardest lessons
for techy types to learn is that it is people that matter, not
technologies. Alternatively, you might say that it is precisely folks
who don't want to learn (or admit) this that are drawn to Usenet (and
particularly to Usenet groups like CLC). This later formulation is in
the category, alas, of "sad, but true".
Having laid the groundwork, let me state my point, which is this: the
reason Usenet is split up into groups is *not* to segregate the
discussion (as the regs so fervently believe - and this despite
occasional rhetoric to the contrary - rhetoric which can be [and always
is] safely ignored), but rather to increase one's chances of connecting
up with someone who can help. I.e., you don't post macrame questions in
a C group because of a fear of offending the regs (or provoking another
one of Kiki's anxiety attacks); rather the reason you abstain from doing
so is simply because you don't fancy your changes of findind that
macrame expert here.
Needless to say, this argument does not hold for finding people who know
about linking programs (again, despite the fevered rhetoric of the regs
to the contrary).