looking at binary files with C

U

Uno

[...]

Code as disorganized as what you present here will fail
with high probability. You have posted in clc enough to
have heard most of the advice on writing good code, and
heard all the mistakes tyros make, some of which you
made here.

Perhaps at this time you are incapable of writing good
beginner's code even with help. What do you say? Do you
want to tackle this?

Get bent. That's english for your english sucks.

And plonk.
 
M

Michael Press

Uno <[email protected]> said:
[...]

Code as disorganized as what you present here will fail
with high probability. You have posted in clc enough to
have heard most of the advice on writing good code, and
heard all the mistakes tyros make, some of which you
made here.

Perhaps at this time you are incapable of writing good
beginner's code even with help. What do you say? Do you
want to tackle this?

Get bent. That's english for your english sucks.

What does English have to do with this?
And plonk.

That's not English.
 
J

James Waldby

What does English have to do with this?


That's not English.

It certainly is. For example, the Wikipedia entry for Plonk (wine)
says "Plonk is an unspecific and derogatory term in British and
Australian English for wine that is notably inexpensive or judged
to be of poor quality." However, Uno, who is the plonker[*] in
the above exchange, undoubtedly meant it in the Plonk (Usenet)
sense, "adding a particular Usenet poster to one's kill file".

[*] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonker>
 
J

J. J. Farrell

Uno said:
[...]

Code as disorganized as what you present here will fail
with high probability. You have posted in clc enough to
have heard most of the advice on writing good code, and
heard all the mistakes tyros make, some of which you
made here.

Perhaps at this time you are incapable of writing good
beginner's code even with help. What do you say? Do you
want to tackle this?

Get bent. That's english for your english sucks.

Interesting; not that it's topical, but what's wrong with his English?
It looks fine to me.
 
T

Tim Rentsch

Eric Sosman said:
#define SIZE 100000
[...]
long a[SIZE];
[...]
for (j = 0; j < 7000000; ++j) {
[...]
So, why the seg fault?

Choose the phrase that most accurately completes this statement:
"7000000 is ________ 100000."

a) less than
b) greater than
c) equal to
d) more equal to
e) more tweeted than

Great answer! Definitely deserves a "Best in thread"
award.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,582
Members
45,071
Latest member
MetabolicSolutionsKeto

Latest Threads

Top